Speech act length - Revision history

Altmann at 12:56, 24 July 2006

2006-07-24T12:56:29Z

Ahans at 09:26, 3 July 2006

2006-07-03T09:26:07Z

Ahans at 09:25, 3 July 2006

2006-07-03T09:25:42Z

Ahans at 09:24, 3 July 2006

2006-07-03T09:24:20Z

Ahans at 14:20, 20 May 2006

2006-05-20T14:20:33Z

New page

'''1. Problem and history'''

Illocutive speech acts have different length in conversation. Their length is measured in terms of the number of different acts of a participant in uninterrupted sequence. The length of illocutive speech acts is part of the dynamics of discourse.
The only approach has been made by Rothe, Altmann and Wagner (1992) analyzing a German polylog of two children and two adults. The following example illustrates the analysis of the text (Gabi is child, Marion is adult):

Gabi /Zeig.Hinweis/

Marion /Anfrag/

/Anred/

Gabi /Feststell/

/Appellier (Zustim)/

Marion /Zustimm/

Gabi /Behaupt.Vergleich/

Marion /Feststell.Widersprech/

Gabi /Bejah/Recht-geb/

/Ueberleg/

/Behaupt.Ueberleg/

/Behaupt.Vergleich/

'''2. Hypothesis'''

''Speech acts abide by the usual length distribution following from the unified theory'' (<math>\rightarrow</math>).

'''3. Derivation'''

In the usual “length”-approach, <math>P_x = g(x)P_{x-1}</math> , one inserts g(x) = (a+bx)/(cx) and solving for x = 1,2,… one obtains the positive negative binomial distribution

(1)<math> P_x = {k+x-1 \choose x}\frac{p^k q^x}{1-p^k}, \quad x= 1, 2, ...</math>

'''Example''': Illocution chains in a German polylogue

Rothe, Altmann and Wagner (1992) fitted the negative binomial distribution to the length of illocution chains of two children (Gabi, Klaus) and two adults (Marion, Nora) from the Dortmunder Korpus of spontaneous children speech (s. Steinsträter 1988) and obtained the results in Table 1.
As can be seen, all fittings are satisfactory. The parameter p symbolizes probably the hierarchy of speakers: the greater p, the more peripheral is the role of the speaker in the polylogue.

<div align="center">[[Image:Tabelle1_SAL.jpg]]</div>

'''4. Authors: G. Altmann'''

'''5. References'''

'''Rothe, U., Altmann, G., Wagner, K.''' (1992). Verteilung der Länge von Sprechakten in der Kindersprache. In: Wagner, K.R. (Hrsg.), ''Kindesprachstatistik: 47-56.'' Essen: Die blaue Eule.

'''Steinsträter, Ch'''. (1988). ''Zur kindlichen Sprachhandlungsfähigkeit: Analyse eines Korpus spontaner Sprechsprache einer Fünfjährigen''. Dortmund: Diss.

'''Wagner, K.R., Steinsträter, Ch'''. (1987). Wörterbuch der illokutiven Typen zum Korpus Teresa. In: Wagner, K.R. (Hrsg.), ''Wortschatz-Erwerb: 59-81''. Bern: Lang.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:56, 24 July 2006
Line 61:		Line 61:


−	'''4. Authors: G. Altmann~~'''~~	+	'''4. Authors''': U. Strauss, G. Altmann

	'''5. References'''		'''5. References'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, 3 July 2006
Line 44:		Line 44:


−	<div align="center">[[Image:~~Tabelle1_SAL~~.jpg]]</div>	+	<div align="center">[[Image:Tabelle11_SAL.jpg]]</div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:26, 3 July 2006
Line 40:		Line 40:

	/Behaupt.Vergleich/		/Behaupt.Vergleich/
		+

	'''2. Hypothesis'''		'''2. Hypothesis'''

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 The only approach has been made by Rothe, Altmann and Wagner (1992) analyzing a German polylog of two children and two adults. The following example illustrates the analysis of the text (Gabi is child, Marion is adult):
-Gabi	/Zeig.Hinweis/
+'''Gabi'''
-Marion	/Anfrag/
+/Zeig.Hinweis/
-	/Anred/
+'''Marion'''
-Gabi	/Feststell/
+/Anfrag/
-	/Appellier (Zustim)/
+/Anred/
-Marion	/Zustimm/
+'''Gabi	'''
-Gabi	/Behaupt.Vergleich/
+/Appellier (Zustim)/
-Marion	/Feststell.Widersprech/
+'''Marion'''
-Gabi	/Bejah/Recht-geb/
+/Zustimm/
-	/Ueberleg/
+'''Gabi'''
-	/Behaupt.Ueberleg/
+/Behaupt.Vergleich/
-	/Behaupt.Vergleich/
+'''Marion'''
 '''2. Hypothesis'''